KS: ‘Denial of justice’ to delay Kansas Supreme Court rulings for eight months, justice says

Admin

A Kansas Supreme Court justice accused his colleagues of denying justice by delaying a series of opinions for eight months after they were decided, a tactic that changed the court’s precedent and accentuated the sway a single justice’s appointment can have. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

They purposely arrange it so that they don’t set a precedent showing the registry to be punishment. They don’t want a large group to get off the registry all at once.

It’s upsetting to see that they held on to the favorable ruiling in 3 cases so they could release it with the unfavorable ruiling in the fourth. I don’t know if the fourth case was on the horizon eight months earlier when the first 3 were decided. But the fact that one of the justices is calling attention to the issue makes me think that the whole thing was planned.

0
Reply

Tell me how registration is not a punishment, and I’ll show you a liar

0
Reply

If it looks like a duck…
If it walks like a duck…
If it quacks like a duck…
………its a duck.
It’s been a failed scheme that cannot withstand the weight of the Constitution.
Mistreatment of people to double jeopardy, further restraint, & discrimination will come to light for the world to see.

0
Reply